What are the latest findings in multiple myeloma, and what do they mean for your clinical practice? Find out how Dr. Shaji Kumar and Dr. María-Victoria Mateos weighed in on the wealth of new data released at ASCO 2022.
Multiple Myeloma: Updates from ASCO 2022
Multiple Myeloma: Updates from ASCO 2022
Multiple Myeloma: Updates from ASCO 2022
Important new data about both current and novel therapies for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were presented at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting. Shaji Kumar, MD, and María-Victoria Mateos, MD, discussed key data and their implications for clinical practice.
Role of ASCT Following Triplet Induction Therapy
The randomized phase 3 DETERMINATION trial evaluated the effect of adding autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to triplet therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy in patients with symptomatic MM. The results, presented at ASCO 2022 and published simultaneously in TheNew England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), showed a significant increase in the risk of progression or death with RVd alone versus ASCT plus RVd (median progression-free survival [PFS], 46.2 vs 67.5 months; hazard ratio, 1.53; P < 0.001) but no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) (79.2% vs 80.7%).1,2
Given the PFS benefit but lack of OS benefit after a median follow-up of 76 months, ASCT continues to be the standard of care, though there is the option to factor in patient preference regarding ASCT as part of first-line therapy. The trial also showed the importance of considering measurable residual disease (MRD) assessments, as there was no significant difference in 5-year PFS between RVd alone and ASCT plus RVd among patients with undetectable MRD (59.2% vs 53.5%).
Prognostic Value of Translocation (11;14)
Translocation (11;14) (t[11;14]) is present in up to 20% of patients with MM. Although t(11;14) has previously been shown to have an intermediate prognostic value, this association was determined in older studies. Given the demonstrated activity of venetoclax in patients with t(11;14), Primohammed and colleagues assessed the prognostic value of t(11;14) in patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving triplet therapy with RVd.3 Of the 869 evaluated patients, t(11;14) was detected in 121. Median PFS was 61.4 months among patients with t(11;14), which was significantly shorter than in other patients, who had a median PFS of 82.6 months (P = 0.002). This finding may identify a potential avenue to improve the outcomes of patients with t(11;14).
GRIFFIN Update: MRD Outcomes
In the randomized phase 2 GRIFFIN trial, the addition of daratumumab to RVd induction and consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance was associated with a significant improvement in the stringent complete response (sCR) rate in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM.4 Rates of undetectable MRD were also higher with daratumumab plus RVd versus RVd at the end of consolidation (47% vs 17%) and at the last follow-up (51% vs 20%).4 At ASCO 2022, Rodriguez and colleagues presented results of a post hoc analysis showing that rates of sustained undetectable MRD (10-5) were higher with daratumumab plus RVd versus RVd for responses lasting at least 6 months and at least 12 months (Figure 1).5 The high rates of MRD negativity will hopefully translate to a better PFS in future analyses. These findings suggest that sustained MRD could be an important surrogate marker in MM and may support increased use of this quadruplet regimen pending more mature data.
Figure 1. Higher rates of sustained undetectable MRD with daratumumab plus RVd vs RVd in the GRIFFIN trial.5
Teclistamab in R/R MM
Teclistamab is a T cell-redirecting bispecific antibody directed against CD3 on T cells and B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) expressed on myeloma cells. Teclistamab is currently being evaluated in the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 trial in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) after at least 3 lines of therapy including triple-class exposure to an immunomodulatory drug, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody. At ASCO 2022, and in a simultaneous NEJMpublication, investigators reported an update from the trial.6,7 The analysis included 165 patients who received teclistamab and had a median of 5 prior lines of therapy; 78% of these patients had triple-class refractory disease. After a median follow-up of 14 months, teclistamab was associated with an overall response rate (ORR) of 63.0%, including 39.4% with a complete response (CR) or better. The median duration of response was 18.4 months, and the median PFS was 11.3 months.6,7
The safety profile was acceptable; however, most patients developed cytokine release syndrome (72%; 0.6% grade 3 and no grade 4) and hematologic adverse events, including neutropenia (70.9%; 64.2% grade 3/4), anemia (52.1%; 37.0% grade 3/4), and thrombocytopenia (40.0%; 21.2% grade 3/4). Infections occurred in 76.4% of patients, with 44.8% developing grade 3/4 infections. Prophylaxis may be needed to protect patients from serious infections. Overall, these findings support the use of teclistamab if it receives FDA approval. The randomized phase 3 MajesTEC-3 trial is currently comparing teclistamab plus daratumumab versus daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) or daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd) in patients with RRMM after 1-3 lines of prior therapy.8
Although the MajesTEC-1 trial does not include a control arm, a comparison of outcomes among 150 patients who received teclistamab in the MajesTEC-1 trial and 248 patients from the real-world observational LocoMMotion trial suggests that teclistamab is more effective than physician’s choice of available therapy as assessed by response rates, OS, PFS, and duration of response.9
Updates in CAR T
Several important analyses were presented at ASCO 2022 that provided additional information about idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), 1 of the 2 BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies that is approved for use in patients with RRMM after at least 4 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Hansen and colleagues presented results of a retrospective, observational real-world analysis of 196 patients with MM who received ide-cel at 1 of 11 US medical centers.10 Among 196 treated patients, ide-cel was associated with a best ORR of 86%, similar to results in the pivotal KarMMA trial (73% ORR).11 The median PFS was 8.9 months, and median OS was not reached after a median follow-up of 5.3 months. Results were similar to those in the KarMMa trial, even though 77% of patients would not have been eligible for the KarMMa trial. PFS outcomes were significantly worse among patients not meeting the KarMMa-1 criteria, highlighting the importance of reviewing real-world evidence.
Rytlewski and colleagues presented results of a correlative analysis undertaken to identify patient profiles associated with less favorable vs more favorable manufacturing outcomes and clinical endpoints among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving ide-cel in the KarMMa trial and in Cohort 1 of KarMMa-2 .12 The analysis identified a common profile among patients more likely to have favorable manufacturing and efficacy outcomes, which included a lower tumor burden, higher starting lymphocyte count, and favorable previous exposure to select therapies. These types of correlative studies are important when trying to select the right patient for these therapies.
New information was also presented on the second FDA-approved BCMA CAR T therapy, ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel). CARTITUDE-2 is a multicohort study evaluating cilta-cel in different patient populations. At ASCO 2022, Einsele and colleagues presented correlative analyses and updated data from the CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A, including 20 patients with 1-3 prior lines of therapy who were lenalidomide refractory and had a median follow-up of 17.1 months.13 In the analysis, cilta-cel was associated with an ORR of 95%, with 90% of patients attaining a CR or better. These data are particularly relevant given that the ongoing phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 trial (NCT04181827) is comparing cilta-cel with the standard of care regimens of daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd) and pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) in this patient population.
Another CARTITUDE-2 presentation focused on Cohort B, which included 19 patients with early relapse after initial therapy with a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent. Early relapse was defined as progression within 12 months after ASCT or within 12 months from the start of therapy for patients who have not had an ASCT. After a median follow-up of 13.4 months, data were available for 19 patients.14 Even in this high-risk population, cilta-cel was associated with an ORR of 100%, including 90% with CR or better. MRD negativity was attained in 14 of 15 evaluable patients (93%). The investigators noted that the safety profile was manageable and predictable, including for the single patient treated in an outpatient setting.
As we continue to learn more from these studies, we will be able to select the most appropriate therapy for each patient based on underlying clinical characteristics and other factors. BCMA-targeted CAR T therapy is expected to move to earlier lines of therapy. The additional knowledge gained from the real-world experience with these therapies as they are being used today will also contribute to improved outcomes for patients treated with CAR T therapy.
The treatment landscape for patients with MM is evolving rapidly in both the newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory settings. For patients with newly diagnosed MM, mature data from the GRIFFIN trial have demonstrated high rates of MRD negativity with the quadruplet regimen of daratumumab plus RVD; this will likely translate to better long-term outcomes. We have also now seen data from the DETERMINATION trial supporting the continued use of ASCT as part of the standard therapy for MM in eligible patients.
For the growing number of patients who have already received the 3 main drug classes—proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies—there is a need for additional therapeutic options. BCMA-targeted therapies are showing an ability to cover this unmet need with bispecific antibodies as well as CAR T therapies. It would be logical to see BCMA-targeted therapies move rapidly to earlier lines of therapy.
- Richardson PG, Jacobus S, Weller E, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) ± autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and R maintenance to progression for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): the phase 3 DETERMINATION trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(17_suppl):LBA4.
- Ricardson PG, Jacobus SJ, Weller EA, et al. Triplet therapy, transplantation, and maintenance until progression in myeloma. N Engl J Med. Published online June 5, 2022. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2204925
- Primohammed S, Joseph NS, Hofmeister CC, et al. Prognostic impact of t(11;14) on PFS1 among myeloma patients receiving triplet induction therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8064.
- Voorhees PM, Kaufman JL, Laubach J, et al. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial. Blood. 2020;136(8):936-945.
- Rodriguez C, Kaufman JL, Laubach J, et al. Daratumumab (DARA) + lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): a post hoc analysis of sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity from GIFFIN. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8011.
- Nooka AK, Moreau P, Usmani SZ, et al. Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: updated efficacy and safety results from MajesTEC-1. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8007.
- Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. Published online June 5, 2022. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2203478
- Mateos MV, Bahlis N, Costa LJ, et al. MajesTEC-3: randomized phase 3 study of teclistamab plus daratumumab versus investigator’s choice of daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone or daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):TPS8072.
- van de Donk NWCJ, Moreau P, Delforge M, et al. Comparative efficacy of teclistamab (tec) versus current treatments (tx) in real-world clinical practice in the prospective LocoMMotion study in patients (pts) with triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8016.
- Hansen DK, Sidana S, Peres L, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): real-world experience. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8042.
- Munshi NC, Anderson LD Jr, Shah N, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):705-716.
- Rytlewski J, Fuller J, Mertz DR, et al. Correlative analysis to define patient profiles associated with manufacturing and clinical endpoints in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients treated with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121), an anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8021.
- Einsele H, Cohen A, Delforge M, et al. Biological correlative analyses and updated clinical data of ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, in lenalidomide-refractory patients with progressive multiple myeloma after 1-3 prior lines of therapy: CARTITUDE-2, Cohort A. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8020.
- van de Donk NWCJ, Agha M, Cohen A, et al. Biological correlative analyses and updated clinical data of ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, in patients with multiple myeloma and early relapse after initial therapy: CARTITUDE-2, Cohort B. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8029.
- Host: Shaji K. Kumar, MD
- Guest: María-Victoria Mateos, MD, PhD
What’s new in multiple myeloma? Find out about the latest data released at ASCO 2022 with this recap of our experts’ perspectives.
Available credits: 0.25
Time to complete: 15 minutes
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
In accordance with the ACCME Standards for Integrity and Independence, Global Learning Collaborative (GLC) requires that individuals in a position to control the content of an educational activity disclose all relevant financial relationships with any ineligible company. GLC mitigates all conflicts of interest to ensure independence, objectivity, balance, and scientific rigor in all its educational programs.
Shaji Kumar, MD
Professor of Medicine
College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic,
Research: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CARsgen, Kite, Merck, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, and TeneoBio
Consulting Fees: AbbVie, Amgen, Antengene, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bluebird Bio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Kite, Oncopeptides, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda
María-Victoria Mateos, MD, PhD
Associate Professor of Hematology
Director, Myeloma Unit
University Hospital of Salamanca
Consulting Fees: Adaptive, Amgen, Bluebird Bio, Celgene-BMS, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sea-Gen, Takeda
- Jorge Bacigalupo has nothing to disclose.
- Stephen Chavez has nothing to disclose.
- Cindy Davidson has nothing to disclose.
- Nick Lombardi has no relevant relationships to report.
- Brian McDonough, MD has nothing to disclose.
- Colleen Resnick has nothing to disclose.
- Anna Trentini has nothing to disclose.
- Stephanie Wenick has nothing to disclose.
After participating in this educational activity, participants should be better able to:
- Analyze the latest clinical data of current and emerging therapies for multiple myeloma released at ASCO 2022
- Define emerging therapeutic strategies to treat patients with multiple myeloma
This activity is designed to meet the educational needs of community oncologists and hematologist oncologists.
Accreditation and Credit Designation Statements
In support of improving patient care, Global Learning Collaborative (GLC) is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
Global Learning Collaborative (GLC) designates this Enduring activity for a maximum of .25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Global Learning Collaborative (GLC) designates this activity for 0.25 nursing contact hours. Nurses should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Global Learning Collaborative (GLC) has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for .25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until July 14, 2023. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.
Prova Education, designs and executes continuing education founded on evidence-based medicine, clinical need, gap analysis, learner feedback, and more. Our mission is to serve as an inventive and relevant resource for clinical content and educational interventions across a broad spectrum of specialties.
Prova Education's methodology demonstrates a commitment to continuing medical education and the innovative assessment of its effects. Our goal is clear—to develop and deliver the very best education in the most impactful manner and to verify its results with progressive outcomes research.
This activity is supported by independent educational grants from AbbVie, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.
The views and opinions expressed in this educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of GLC and Prova Education. This presentation is not intended to define an exclusive course of patient management; the participant should use his/her clinical judgment, knowledge, experience, and diagnostic skills in applying or adopting for professional use any of the information provided herein. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patients’ conditions and possible contraindications or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities. Links to other sites may be provided as additional sources of information. Once you elect to link to a site outside of Prova Education you are subject to the terms and conditions of use, including copyright and licensing restriction, of that site.
Reproduction of this material is not permitted without written permission from the copyright owner.
Our site requires a computer, tablet, or mobile device and a connection to the Internet. For best results, a high-speed Internet connection is recommended (DSL/Cable/Fibre). We also recommend using the latest version of your favorite browser to ensure compliance with W3C standards, such as Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Microsoft Edge.
- Minute CME/CE™
Navigating New Waters in HER2+ mCRC: Selection of the Optimal Targeted Regimen, a Case-Based Approach1.00 program credit
John H. Strickler, MDPeer
- Minute CME/CE™
What Are the Clinical Features of HER2 Amplified Colorectal Cancers?1.00 program credit
- Minute CME/CE™
A Look at HER2-Targeted TKIs: How Does Target Specificity Impact Outcomes?1.00 program credit